Cases 41 - 50 of 130
US v. Rondell Lundy
as 19-4555
Defendant / Appellant:
RONDELL L. LUNDY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
James Biggins v. Perry Phelps, et al
as 19-2234
Defendant:
STANLEY BAYNARD, MATTHEW DUTTON, CHRISTOPHER CESSNA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
CO CONNORS, SGT. FREDDRICKS, LT. WALLACE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
James Biggins v. Matt Denn, et al
as 19-2095
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER KLINE, ROBERT COUPE, LEANN DUNN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
TIM MARTIN, Paralegal II, DANA METZGER, Warden, STANLEY BAYNARD, Internal Affairs and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Anthony Meeks v. Campbell, et al
as 19-1510
Defendant / Appellee:
LIEUTENANT SCATE, WARDEN CAMPBELL, K. KARTE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY MEEKS
Jose Turcios v. Tabitha Carter, et al
as 19-1374
Defendant / Appellee:
Andrea Carter, individually, Michael Lundy, individually, December Smith and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jose Turcios, D.D.S.
Defendant:
Brandon Eggerth, individually, Jared McCauley, individually and Brian Dunger, individually
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. v. Carter et al
as 1:2019cv00279
Respondent:
Michael Lundy and Aaron Carter
Petitioner:
Halliburton Energy Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES v. LUNDY LAW, LLP et al
as 2:2013cv02398
Defendant:
TITAN OUTDOOR LLC,, L. LEONARD LUNDY and LUNDY LAW, LLP
Petitioner:
DLA PIPER LLP (US), DR. DARREN LUGIANO, ESQUIRE CARL W. HITTINGER and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY PITT & ASSOCIATES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04373
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
