Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 582
SCHEINER v. GOETTLER et al
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff: JACOB SCHEINER
Defendant: MICHAEL GOETTLER, W. DON CORNWELL, ROBERT J. COURY and others
(PS) Malik et al v. Iqbal et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01462
Plaintiff: Muhammad Younas Malik and Nazia Jabeen Iqbal
Defendant: Mohammad Ahsan Iqbal, Sadia Naseem, Shazia Jabeen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv81014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCCORD v. VIATRIS INC. et al
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff: KATHRYN P. MCCORD and EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES CARPENTERS PENSION, ANNUITY AND HEALTH FUNDS (EASC)
Defendant: VIATRIS INC., MICHAEL GOETTLER, RAJIV MALIK and others
Petitioner: Charles Mizerany
US v. Kenneth Wise
as 23-4398
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: KENNETH MALIK WISE, a/k/a KG, a/k/a Kenny, a/k/a Big Psyxho
USA v. Omar Miller
as 23-11911
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: OMAR MALIK MILLER
USA v. Malik We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10610
Plaintiff / Appellee: United States of America
Defendant / Appellant: Nohmaan Malik, also known as Nohmaan Riaz Malik
Atif Malik v. R. BarletteIn re: Atif Malik v. R. Barlette We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-2020
Petitioner: In re: ATIF B. MALIK
Respondent: R. BARLETTE and PATRICIA L. DODGE
Sean FryerIn re: Sean Fryer
as 23-2010
Petitioner: In re: SEAN MICHAEL FRYER
Not Classified By Court: FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, MICHELLE L. OLSHEFSKI and SGT HEBRON
Respondent: DR MALIK and ROBERT D. MARIANI
OH v. Shardaye Bey
as 23-3449
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF OHIO
Defendant / Appellant: SHARDAYE JEACOLE MALIK BEY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?