Cases 41 - 50 of 207
Constr. Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust v. Carbonite, Inc., et al
as 20-2110
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY FOLGER, MOHAMAD S. ALI and CARBONITE, INC.
Defendant:
LINDA CONNLY, MARINA LEVINSON, CHARLES F. KANE and others
Interested Party:
CAMELOT EVENT DRIVEN FUND, A Series of Frank Funds Trust, TOM JOHNATAN OR-PAZ, PETER WU and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST
Plaintiff:
VALERIE COSGROVE, RUBEN A. LUNA, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, WILLIAM FENG, individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Allstate Insurance Company et al v. Applied Rehab & Physical Therapy LLC d/b/a Applied Rehab et al
as 2:2020cv12407
Defendant:
Naim Khanafer, D.C., Hussein Huraibi, M.D., Mohamad Kazan and others
Plaintiff:
Esurance Insurance Company, Allstate Insurance Company, Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
AKHTAR MOHAMAD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as FLN/8:20-CV-69609
Plaintiff:
AKHTAR MOHAMAD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1626
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Respondent / Appellee:
STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigrations and Customs Enforcement and CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza, et al
as 20-1564
Petitioner:
JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated and MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, in his official capacity as Deputy DIrector and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the DIrector for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
RICK RAEMISCH, JULIO MEDEIROS NEVES JUNIO, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS and others
Sandeep Mohamad v. William Barr
as 20-71105
Petitioner:
SANDEEP MOHAMAD
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
MRM Imaging Company v. Bazo et al
as 2:2020cv10317
Defendant:
Esssential Image & Design, Inc. d/b/a Bazo Construction, Bazo Imaging & Construction, Bazo Construction, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
MRM Imaging Company
Counter Defendant:
Mohamad Yousef and Mustapha Missilmani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Katz et al v. Ali et al
as 1:2020cv10089
Defendant:
iRobot Corporation, Mohamad Ali, Ruey-Bin Kao and others
Plaintiff:
David Katz and Thomas Wightman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078 j
Mohamad King v. Tatitlek Support Services, Inc, et al
as 20-55029
Defendant / Appellee:
GEONORTH, LLC and TATITLEK SUPPORT SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOHAMAD KING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
