Cases 41 - 50 of 553
William X. Nietzche v. Urban Housing Development LLC, et al
as 23-5148
In Re:
In re: Sealed Case
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William X. Nietzche
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Julie Ann Metcalf Kinney
Defendant / Appellee:
Urban Housing Development LLC, Roman Ozeruga, In both public and private capacities, Mark G. Passannante, In both public and private capacities and others
Linthicum et al v. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission et al
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Dennis Linthicum and Anthony Intiso
Defendant:
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, The State of Oregon, The State of California and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Not Classified By Court:
STATE OF MICHIGAN and STATE OF CALIFORNIA
3Rd Party Defendant:
NBCUNIVERSAL MEDIA, LLC, COMCAST CORPORATION and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Petitioner:
AMAZON.COM, INC., APPLE INC., DUCK DUCK GO, INC. and others
Respondent:
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC. and YELP INC.
Interested Party:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Westmoreland Mining Holdings v. EPA
as 20-1160
Petitioner:
Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor:
Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation, Montana Environmental Information Center and others
State of West Virginia, et al v. EPA, et al
as 15-1363
Petitioner:
State of West Virginia, State of Texas, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Regina A. McCarthy, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Intervenor:
American Wind Energy Association, Advanced Energy Economy, American Lung Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
William D. Ruckelshaus, William K. Reilly, Philip Zoebisch and others
Murray Energy Corporation v. EPA, et al
as 16-1127
Intervenor:
American Public Health Association, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, State of California and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, Gina McCarthy and others
Amicus Curiae:
Robert P. Mason, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, Joel D. Blum and others
Petitioner:
Murray Energy Corporation
State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et alIn re: State of Oregon, et al v. USDC-ORP, et al
as 23-70127
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STATE OF OREGON
Petitioner:
STATE OF OREGON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Plaintiff:
PAUL JULIAN MANEY, GARY CLIFT, GEORGE W. NULPH and others
Defendant:
PATRICK ALLEN
United States of America et al v. City of Sandy, Oregon
as 3:2023cv00968
Plaintiff:
United States of America and State of Oregon, by and Through Department of Environmental Quality
Defendant:
City of Sandy, Oregon
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319 Clean Water Act
State of California v. United States Department of En
as 21-108
Petitioner:
State of Maine, State of Michigan, State of California and others
Respondent:
United States Department of Energy, Dan Brouillette, Secretary, United States Department of Energy and Jennifer M. Granholm, Secretary, United States Department of Energy
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor:
Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court:
240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
