Cases 41 - 50 of 237
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Degree Mechanical, Inc. et al v. J.C. Welding, LLC et al
as 5:2019cv05133
Plaintiff:
Degree Mechanical, LLC and Degree Mechanical, Inc.
Defendant:
Juan Castillo, J.C. Welding, LLC, Mrs. Shine, LLC and others
La Clinica De La Raza et al v. Trump et al
as 4:2019cv04980
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Plaintiff:
Maternal and Child Health Access, Central American Resource Center, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), MinKwon Center for Community Action and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2019cv04975
Plaintiff:
District of Columbia, State of Maine, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
Amicus Curiae:
GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders (GLAD), Japanese American Citizens League (JACL), Women Lawyers on Guard Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, Center for Public Representation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff:
City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant:
Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner:
Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv06299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff:
State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra et al v. Azar
as 3:2019cv02552
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Eric Wright, Bettina Joyner and others
Plaintiff:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, State of Connecticut, State of California by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Service Employees International Union Local 503, Kay Wright, Ed Solseng and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Philip Lozano v. Johnson and Johnson et al
as 2:2019cv03372
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Cal Oaks Pharmacy, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Lozano and Philip Lozano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
