Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 10,983
Coleman, et al. v. Newsom, et al.
as 24-2938
Plaintiff: RALPH COLEMAN, JORGE ANDRADE RICO, PETER COCKCROFT and others
Defendant: GAVIN NEWSOM, JEFF MACOMBER, JOE STEPHENSHAW and others
Alexander v. Springer et al
as 3:2024cv02139
Plaintiff: Carrie Alexander
Defendant: Daniel D. Springer, Enrique Salem, Peter Solvik and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00448
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01222
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01014
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Manere v. Collins et al
as 3:2024cv00820
Plaintiff: Robert Manere
Defendant: Denise Collins and Peter Collins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Naboo Royal Cruiser LLC v. Gulfgen LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21711
Plaintiff: Naboo Royal Cruiser LLC
Defendant: Gulfgen LLC, Peter Nomikos and C. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal
Profundity LLC v. Gulfgen LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21708
Plaintiff: Profundity LLC
Defendant: Gulfgen LLC, Peter Nomikos and C. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Motion for Leave to File Notice of Appeal
Bondurant v. Kubota
as 24-2806
Plaintiff: NANCY R. BONDURANT
Defendant: PETER KENJI KUBOTA, Individually and Acting in His Official Capacity as Judge of the Third Circuit Court, Hilo, Hawaii
Brown v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2024cv00767
Plaintiff: Peter Brown
Defendant: EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group, S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?