Cases 41 - 50 of 753
Tanya Winters v. USDC-AZP
as 22-70245
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TANYA WINTERS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
TANYA WINTERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, PHOENIX
Vince Van Vleck v. Leikin, Ingber & Winters, P.C.
as 22-1859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCE NICOLAS VAN VLECK
Defendant / Appellee:
LEIKIN, INGBER & WINTERS, P.C., dba Ingber & Winters, P.C.
Verschleiser v. Frydman et al
as 1:2022cv07909
Plaintiff:
Eli Verschleiser
Defendant:
Jacob Frydman, Monica Libin Frydman, Alexander Libin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Mosquera-Castro
as 22-30568
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Aron Winter Mosquera-Castro, also known as Winston, also known as Prieto
United States v. Winters
as 22-8061
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHARLES WINIFRED WINTERS, JR.
In re: Seth Winters, et al v. Metric Roofing, Inc., et al
as 22-16266
Debtor:
In the Matter of: SETH MICHAEL WINTERS and GENEVIEVE ALYCE WINTERS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
METRIC ROOFING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
SETH MICHAEL WINTERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cofield v. Bailen et al
as 1:2022cv02030
Plaintiff:
Keenan K. Cofield and Dr. Keenan K. Cofield
Defendant:
Esquire Mark I Bailen, Baker & Hostetler LLP, Progressive Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Jeff Witt et al v. David Michery et al
as 2:2022cv05336
Plaintiff:
Jeff Witt and Joseph Birbigalia
Defendant:
David Michery, Ignacio Novoa, Mary Winter and others
Debtor In Possession:
Kent Puckett
Jogaak v. Hayley et al
as 4:2022cv04105
Defendant:
Jogaak D. Jogaak, Jacob Hayley, Stefanie Schaefer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
