Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Kurtz et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as TXN/3:16-cv-00963
Plaintiff:
Barbara Kurtz , Susan Brown , Carol Kiel and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Sitestar Corporation v. Moore et al
as 2:2015cv00165
Defendant:
Alesia Asset Management LLC, Alesia Value Fund LLC, Arquitos Capital Management, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sitestar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kiel v. Kohl's Department Stores Inc et al
as 2:2015cv00060
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kiel
Defendant:
Kohl's Department Stores Inc and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
USA v. Keith Kiel, et al
as 14-60751
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH ANTHONY KIEL, also known as Thug and RANDY LAVERNE MARSHALL, also known as Boss, also known as Boss Hog
USA v. Keith Kiel, et al
as 14-60747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH ANTHONY KIEL, also known as Thug
USA v. Keith Kiel
as 14-60748
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEITH ANTHONY KIEL, also known as Thug
Higgins v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as ILS/3:13-cv-51346
Plaintiff:
Kiel Higgins
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Morris et al v. Kiel et al
as 2:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
John Morris and Ellen Morris
Defendant:
Cynthia Adams Kiel and Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NAPP Technologies. L.L.C. v. Kiel Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2012mc91300
Plaintiff:
NAPP Technologies. L.L.C.
Defendant:
Kiel Laboratories, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Kiel Laboratories, Inc.
Thirdparty_defendant:
Supriya Chemicals
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
