Cases 51 - 60 of 115
DF Servicing, LLC v. HAL Development Corp., et al.
as 3:2015cv01632
Counter_defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
HAL Development Corp., Hector Miguel Torres-Zayas, Natascha Del Valle-Galarza and others
Plaintiff:
DF Servicing, LLC
Counter_claimant:
DF Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08875
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Bauer et al v. dfs services llc
as 4:2014cv12256
Plaintiff:
Jill Marie Bauer and James Neil Bauer
Defendant:
dfs services llc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. Bank of America N.A. (USA)
as 14-1610
Plaintiff:
Herve Senequier
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Woodrow Clark, Paul Impellezzeri, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Robert Ross and others
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A. (USA), Capital One, J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Citigroup, Inc., Citibank (South Dakota), N.A., Citicorp Diners Club and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
LeBlanc v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as NYS/1:14-cv-00426
Plaintiff:
Paul LeBlanc
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and DFS Services LLC
LeBlanc v. Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Paul LeBlanc
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A. and DFS Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
