Cases 51 - 60 of 463
Balderas v. Tiny Lab Productions et al
as 1:2018cv00854
Defendant:
Twitter Inc., Mopub Inc., Google Inc and others
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico ex rel Hector Balderas, Attorney General and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREEDOM WATCH, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. et al
as 1:2018cv02030
Defendant:
APPLE INC., GOOGLE INC., FACEBOOK INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM WATCH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Delima v. YouTube Inc., et al
as 18-1728
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATASHA DELIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC. and others
Delima v. YouTube, Inc., et al
as 18-1666
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATASHA DELIMA
Defendant / Appellee:
YOUTUBE, FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC. and others
United States of America v. Applins (Griffin)
as 18-1969
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Clayton Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Griffin, AKA Meeshack and Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
Personal Audio, LLC v. Google Inc.
as 4:2018mc80098
Plaintiff:
Personal Audio, LLC
Defendant:
Google Inc.
United States of America v. Google Inc. et al
as 4:2018mc80071
Movant:
United States of America
Respondent:
Google Inc. and You Tube, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
United States of America v. Applins (Thomas)
as 18-972
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Billy J. Applins, AKA Gee, AKA Billy Pringle, James Clayton Kelly, AKA Boom, Nathan Speights, The Mole and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Gregory Thomas, AKA Little Earl, E-Z
Sayre v. Google, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00037
Plaintiff:
Paul Joseph Sayre
Defendant:
Google, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Bradley James Much v. United States of America et al
as 2:2017cv09292
Defendant:
ABC Corporation, AT and T, Actors, Actresses and Media Personalities and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley James Much
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
