Cases 51 - 60 of 449
Honeywell International Inc. v. Sunoco (R&M), LLC et al
as 5:2018cv01176
Defendant:
Sunoco, Inc., Atlantic Refining & Marketing, LLC, Sunoco (R&M), LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 - Cause of Action Arising under CERCLA
Honeywell International Inc. v. Citgo Petroleum Corporation
as 5:2019cv01219
Plaintiff:
Honeywell International Inc.
Defendant:
Citgo Petroleum Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601 - Cause of Action Arising under CERCLA
Arconic Inc. et al v. Cal-Tron Plating, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02586
Plaintiff:
Arconic Inc., Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., Vanowen Holdings, LLC and others
Defendant:
Electronic Chrome & Grinding Co., Inc., Mid-West Fabricating Co., Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901
Arconic Inc. et al v. Alpha Therapeutic Corporation
as 2:2020cv02584
Plaintiff:
Arconic Inc., Quest Diagnostics Clinical Laboratories, Inc., International Paper Company and others
Defendant:
Alpha Therapeutic Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0901
JERSEY CITY MUNICIPAL UTILITIES AUTHORITY v. HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.
as 2:2005cv05955
Not Yet Classified:
INLAND SOUTHEAST JERSEY CITY, LLC, G. HELLER ENTERPRISES, INC., DANIEL F. BECHT and others
Defendant:
Elisabeth Rosario, HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC., Michael Vo and others
Not Classified By Court:
FOX ROTHSCHILD LLP and JEFFREY M. POLLOCK
Cross Defendant:
CITY OF JERSEY CITY, Bayonne Municipal Utilities Authority, STEVE GALLO and others
Special Master:
JOHN HUGHES and SENATOR ROBERT G. TORRICELLI
Interested Party:
Gibbons, PC
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSARIO and ELIZABETH ROSARIO
Petitioner:
Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, K&L GATES, LLP and McCarter & English LLP
Respondent:
GIORDANO,HALLERAN & CIESLA, PC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901
The Commissioner of The Georgia Department of Natural Resources v. Honeywell International Inc.
as 1:2019cv05709
Plaintiff:
The Commissioner of The Georgia Department of Natural Resources
Defendant:
Honeywell International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Connie Dietrich v. The Boeing Company, et al
as 19-56409
Defendant:
SOCO WEST, INC., Brenntag West, Inc. f/k/a SOCO-Lynch Corporation successor in interest to Western Chemical and Manufacturing, Co., WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., individually and as successor in interest to Owens-Illinois Glass Company and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CONNIE DIETRICH, an individual
Defendant / Appellant:
THE BOEING COMPANY, improperly denominated as The Boeing Company, individually and as successor by merger to McDonnell Douglas Corporation, successor by merger with Dougla Aircraft Company
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION v. 21ST CENTURY FOX AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv11273
Defendant:
LEEMILT'S PETROLEUM INC., TEXTRON INC., AMERICAN INKS & COATINGS CORPORATION and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PMC GLOBAL INC. and BATH IRON WORKS CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL CORPORATION
3Rd Party Defendant:
BIBBS AUTO RECYCLING, INC., ALEXANDRIA PLASTIC MOLDING AND MANUFACTURING, INC., STOVER AVENUE CORPORATION and others
Special Master:
THOMAS P. SCRIVO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9613
Universal Atlantic Systems Inc v. Honeywell International Inc
as 19-3494
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNIVERSAL ATLANTIC SYSTEMS INC, a Pennsylvania Corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, a Delaware Corporation
Marietta Yaw, et al v. GE, et al
as 19-35816
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, CBS CORPORATION, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor-by-merger to CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, also as successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
Defendant:
WESTERN AUTO SUPPLY, VIKING PUMP, INC., GARDNER-DENVER, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD ARTHUR YAW
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIETTA DIANNE YAW, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Donald Arthur Yaw
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
