Cases 51 - 60 of 107
USA v. Lashawn Quinn
as 15-31023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LASHAWN QUINN, also known as Monk Quinn
USA v. Duwane Gilmore
as 14-15742
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DUWANE GILMORE, a.k.a. Monk
Cantu Services Inc v. Monk et al
as 5:2014cv00860
Plaintiff:
Cantu Services Inc
Defendant:
Kevin Monk , Renee Ellender Roberie , Joseph Burton and others
Intervenor:
Blackstone Consulting Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monk v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as WVS/2:14-cv-20396
Plaintiff:
Andy Wayne Monk
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00613
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Monk et al v. Mabus et al
as 3:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
James Cottam, James Davis, Kevin Marret and others
Defendant:
Deborah Lee James, Ray Mabus and John McHugh
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552
Ronald Monk, et al v. Johnson & Johnson, et al
as 13-4778
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RONALD MONK, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and SJUNDE AP-FONDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, DOMINIC J. CARUSO and COLLEEN A. GOGGINS
Not Party - Appellant:
ORLOFF FAMILY TRUST DTD 12/13/01, ORLOFF FAMILY TRUST DTD 10/03/91 and DR MARSHALL ORLOFF IRA R/O
United States of America v. Colon (Monk)
as 13-3041
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Angel Colon, AKA A, Gabriel Boria, AKA Indio, Benny Rosario, AKA Benny Blanco and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Carlos Rivera, AKA C.O. Moco, AKA Moc, Daamu Diggs, AKA Smoke, AKA Mook and Thelonious Monk, AKA Shaka
Richard Monk et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc
as TXN/3:13-cv-02414
Plaintiff:
Richard Monk and Amy Monk
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Pecial_master:
Special Master
US v. Ronald Monk
as 13-6888
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONALD MICHAEL DWAYNE MONK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
