Cases 51 - 60 of 154
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681
Smith v. Gilat Satellite Networks Ltd et al
as 1:2020cv01944
Defendant:
Dafna Sharir, Meir Shamir, Amiram Boehm and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
United States of America v. Davis
as 19-2692
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Davis, AKA Clep, AKA Clip, AKA Michael Smith
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
In re: Michael Harriot
as 19-1914
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2019md02901
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Matthew Smith, Ryan Combs, Al Balls and others
In Re:
Ford Motor Co. F-150 and Ranger Truck Fuel Economy Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Smith v. Ford Motor Company
as MIE/2:19-CV-11993
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Smith and Michael Smith
US v. Michael Harriot
as 19-6896
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Smith v. Crisp Regional Hospital, Inc., et al
as 19-12225
Defendant / Appellee:
CRISP REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, INC., CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION, INC. and CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH, as next friend of MS
US v. Michael Smith
as 19-6807
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SMITH, a/k/a Lil Mikey
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Smith
as 19-1624
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Smith, AKA Bum Jew
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
