Cases 61 - 70 of 526
Smarter Tools Inc. v. Chongqing Senci Import & Expor
as 21-724
Defendant / Appellee:
Chongqing AM Pride Power & Machinery Co. Ltd. and Chongqing Senci Import & Export Trade Co., Ltd.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Smarter Tools Inc.
Brenda Garland v. The Snap-On Incorporated, et al
as 21-10983
Defendant / Appellee:
SNAP-ON INCORPORATED, SNAP-ON TOOLS COMPANY, LLC, SIOUX TOOLS COMPONENT, and it's Administrator, The Retirement Plan Committee appointed by the Board of Directors of Snap-On Incorporated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRENDA GARLAND
JORDAN v. MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION
as 1:2021cv00490
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JORDAN
Defendant:
MATCO TOOLS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Trench Tech International, Inc. et al v. Tech Con Trenching, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00403
Defendant:
Tech Con Trenching, Inc., CTS Manufacturing, LLC, Jack Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Trench Tech International, Inc. and Trench-Tech, Ltd.
USA v. Robert Toole
as 21-10651
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT TOOLE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Toole (Algernon Toole)
as 21-365
Defendant:
Lawrence A. Williams, AKA "Wease" and Everette Toole, AKA "E"
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Algernon Toole, AKA Al, AKA Priest
Anderson Tooling, Inc. v. United States
as 21-1190
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Anderson Tooling, Inc.
Haywood Energy Corp. v. Level 5 Tools, LLC et al.
as 2:2021cv02040
Plaintiff:
Haywood Energy Corp.
Defendant:
Level 5 Tools, LLC and Scott A Murray
Chongqing Loncin Engine Parts Co. Ltd. et al v. New Monarch Machine Tool, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00084
Plaintiff:
Chongqing Loncin Engine Parts Co., Ltd., Nanjing Loncin Nemak Precision Machinery Co. Ltd. and Chongqing Lightweight Automotive Components Co., Ltd.
Defendant:
New Monarch Machine Tool, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
