Cases 61 - 70 of 242
The Pension Fund for the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 35 et al v. Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A. et al
as 5:2016mc00487
Defendant:
Altisource Portfolio Solutions, S.A., William Erbey, Michelle D. Esterman and others
In Re:
Altisource Portfolio Soultions S.A. Securities Litigation
Movant:
Southwest Buisness Corporation
Plaintiff:
The Annuity Fund for the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 35 and The Pension Fund for the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council 35
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
BAC5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS v. CELTIC MASONARY RESTORATION, INC.
as 2:2016mc00128
Plaintiff:
BAC5 OF NEW JERSEY PENSION AND ANNUITY FUNDS
Defendant:
CELTIC MASONARY RESTORATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: Registration of Foreign Judgment
Type:
Other Statutes
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 147 HEALTH FUND AND OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 147 ANNUITY FUND v. Ford Pile Foundations, Inc.
as 2:2016mc00009
Plaintiff:
OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO 147 HEALTH FUND AND OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NO. 147 ANNUITY FUND
Defendant:
FORD PILE FOUNDATIONS, INC.
IBEW Local No. 58 Annuity Fun, et al v. Everyware Global, Inc., et al
as 16-3445
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IBEW LOCAL NO. 58 ANNUITY FUND, ELECTRICAL WORKERS PENSION TRUST FUND OF IBEW LOCAL NO. 58, DETROIT, MICHIGAN and IBEW LOCAL NO. 58
Defendant - Appellee:
EVERYWARE GLOBAL, INC., JOHN K SHEPPARD, BERNARD F PETERS and others
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 21 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Willey
as 1:2016mc00012
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 21 Health and Welfare Fund, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 21 Annuity Fund, International Union of Painters and Allied Trades District Council No. 21 Vacation Fund and others
Defendant:
Elmer Willey
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 676 AND EMPLOYERS ANNUITY FUND, ET AL v. HIGHWAY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
as 1:2016mc00003
Plaintiff:
TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION 676 AND EMPLOYERS ANNUITY FUND, ET AL
Defendant:
HIGHWAY SAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, et al. v. RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
as 2:2016mc00037
Plaintiff:
TRUSTEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY DISTRICT COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS PENSION FUND, WELFARE FUND, ANNUITY FUND, APPRENTICESHIP, JOURNEYMAN RETRAINING, EDUCATIONAL AND INDUSTRY FUND, et al.
Defendant:
RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
City of Sterling Heights Gener, et al v. Prudential Financial Inc, et al
as 16-1090
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CITY OF STERLING HEIGHTS GENERAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and of Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, HEAVY & GENERAL LABORERS LOCALS 472 & 172 PENSION ANNUITY FUNDS, NATIONAL SHOPMEN PENSION FUND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL INC, JOHN R. STRANGFELD, RICHARD J. CARBONE and others
City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System v. Prudential Financial, Inc.
as 2:2015mc00295
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights General Employees Retirement System, Heavy & General Laborers' Locals 473 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds, National Shopmen Pension Fund and others
Movant:
John Chiang
Defendant:
Prudential Financial, Inc.
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System et al v. Prudential Financial Inc. et al
as 2:2015mc00146
Plaintiff:
City of Sterling Heights General Employees' Retirement System , National Shopmen Pension Fund , Heavy & General Laborers Locals 472 & 172 Pension Annuity Funds and others
Defendant:
Prudential Financial Inc., Strangfeld R. John and Mark B. Grier
Movant:
California Department of Insurance and David E. Jones
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
