Cases 61 - 70 of 369
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al
as 20-1377
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT A. ENYART, JOEY RHOADS, COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellant:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT, GOVERNOR JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor, State of Colorado and JILL HUNSAKER RYAN, in her official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
Amicus Curiae:
INTERFAITH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION, COVENANT NETWORK OF PRESBYTERIANS, EQUAL PARTNERS IN FAITH and others
Coney Island Prep et al v. United States Department of Health And Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv09144
Plaintiff:
Coney Island Prep, Leslie-Bernard Joseph, Alexandra Greenberg and others
Defendant:
Dr. Robert R Redfield, Dr. Robert Kadlec, Alex M. Azar, II and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
United Therapeutics Corp. v. HHS, et al
as 20-5328
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United Therapeutics Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Food and Drug Administration, Stephen M. Hahn, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Food and Drug Administration, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Denver Bible Church, et al v. Azar, et al
as 20-1391
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN T. MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of the Treasury, CHAD W. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH, DENVER BIBLE CHURCH, ROBERT A. ENYART and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
WELLNESS PHARMACY, INC. et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv03082
Plaintiff:
MEDQUEST PHARMACY, INC., WELLNESS PHARMACY, INC., MADAME RX, LLC and others
Defendant:
ALEX M. AZAR, II, STEPHEN M. HAHN and FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS et al v. AZAR et al
as 1:2020cv02906
Defendant:
THOMAS J. ENGELS, ALEX M. AZAR, II, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN WHITE CLINICS FOR 340B ACCESS, CHATTANOOGA C.A.R.E.S. doing business as CEMPA COMMUNITY CARE, MATTHEW 25 AIDS SERVICES, INC. and others
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC., ASTRAZENECA LP, SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Association of Community Cancer Centers et al v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv03531
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M Azar, II, Brad Smith and others
Plaintiff:
National Infusion Center Association, Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, Association of Community Cancer Centers and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association v. Azar, II et al
as 5:2020cv00522
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund v. Azar II et al
as 1:2020cv05920
Plaintiff:
Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Secretary Alex M. Azar II, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Gimadiev v. Azar et al
as 1:2020cv04248
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Robert R. Redfield, MD, Stephanie Michel and others
Plaintiff:
Ildar Gimadiev
Interested Party:
ARK Import Export Center, LLC doing business as The ARK at JFK, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
