Cases 61 - 70 of 221
Rice et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2022cv11143
Plaintiff:
Keith Rice and Paris Motley-Rice
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Robert J. Kinggo III, Trott Law, P.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Charlie McClain, Jr., et alIn re: Charlie McClain, Jr., et al
as 22-1934
Petitioner:
In re: CHARLIE MCCLAIN, JR. and SALLY KATHERINE MCCLAIN
Respondent:
KENT COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS and FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORP
Moreno Armas v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
as 0:2022cv60913
Plaintiff:
Raidel Moreno Armas
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Moreno Armas v. FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
as 9:2022cv80735
Plaintiff:
Raidel Moreno Armas
Defendant:
FREEDOM MORTGAGE CORPORATION,
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2605 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00799
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Taylor v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 1:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
