Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Doe v. Wolf et al
as 3:2020cv00481
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
USCIS, Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Marvin Garcia v. Field Office Director United S, et al
as 20-2735
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARVIN AGUILAR GARCIA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTOR EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW, in his official capacity as Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Mohammed Siddiqui, et al v. ICE, et al
as 20-2762
Petitioner:
Sergio Gallego, Inemo Seimokuma Clement, Sauveur Victor and others
Respondent / Appellee:
Joel L. Brott, Sherburne County Sheriff, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Matthew Albence, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Mohammed Siddiqui
Grant v. Decker
as 20-2739
Respondent:
Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner:
Dudley Grant
Ogunmola v. Whaling
as 20-2724
Respondent:
William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, of the United States, Kevin McAleenan, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffery Searls, in his official capacity as Facility Director, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner:
Saidat Iyabo Ogunmola
Graham v. Decker
as 20-2740
Respondent:
Attorney General William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, United States Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas R. Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of United States Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Roland Graham
Kolawole Tomiwa v. Warden Bergen County Jail, et al
as 20-2643
Defendant / Appellant:
DIRECTOR NEW YORK FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, WARDEN BERGEN COUNTY JAIL, DIRECTOR NEWARK NEW JERSEY FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KOLAWOLE O. TOMIWA
Celimen Savino, et al v. Souza
as 20-1768
Interested Party:
JHONY BONILLA OCHOA, KARINA ROJAS VARGAS, CARLOS CARANGUI and others
Petitioner:
MARIA ALEJANDRA CELIMEN SAVINO, and all those similarly situated and JULIO CESAR MEDEIROS NEVES, and all those similarly situated
Respondent:
TODD M. LYONS, in his official capacity as Acting Director of the Boston Field Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, STEVEN J. SOUZA, in his official capacity as Superintendent of the Bristol County House of Corrections, THOMAS M. HODGSON, in his official capacity as Bristol County Sheriff and others
Ferreyra v. Decker
as 20-2293
Respondent:
Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner:
Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Jose Rufino v. Director Newark New Jersey, et al
as 20-2426
Defendant / Appellant:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DIRECTOR NEWARK NEW JERSEY FIELD OFFICE IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOSE BAEZ RUFINO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
