Cases 61 - 70 of 3,083
Mario Meza-Perez v. Merrick Garland
as 24-1089
Petitioner:
MARIO ARTURO MEZA-PEREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND
United States of America v. Reynoso-Hiciano (Reynoso)
as 24-214
Defendant:
MARIO REYNOSO-HICIANO, JOEL CABRERA, YUDITH REYNOSO-HICIANO and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO REYNOSO
NADA et al v. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES et al
as 1:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
HAZIM NADA and LORD ENERGY SA
Defendant:
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES, ARIAF STUDIES AND RESEARCH LLC, ABU DHABI NATIONAL OIL COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2024cv00205
Not Yet Classified:
HAZIM NADA, LORD ENERGY SA, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES and others
Defendant:
NO PARTY
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
USA v. Gonzalez
as 24-50056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Gonzalez
Perech-Ixcuna v. Garland
as 24-1099
Petitioner:
MARIO PERECH-IXCUNA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
LONGOBARDI v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00093
Petitioner:
MARIO LONGOBARDI
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Obregon v. Napier, et al.
as 24-350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO ARMANDO OBREGON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK NAPIER, LAURA CONOVER, CHRIS NANOS and others
Hayes v. County of Kern, et al.
as 24-193
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES HAYES, individually
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF KERN, MARIO ROJAS, Deputy, JOCELYN WOLTERS and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Alati Food & Drink II Inc. et al.
as 8:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Alati Food & Drink II Inc. d/b/a Alati Food & Drink, Mario Pappas, Timothy Spyratos and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
