Cases 61 - 70 of 104
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv10451
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gunn et al v. Cochran Law Firm, The et al
as 7:2014cv01822
Plaintiff:
Kay Gunn , Constance Hawkins , Demila Hawkins and others
Defendant:
Cochran Law Firm, The and Byron R Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, L.P., et al
as 14-10963
Respondent - Appellant:
JOHN SEAY and MAE SEAY
Appellee:
CHARLENE CANTRELL KOONCE
McDonald v. Taylor et al
as 3:2014mc00794
Plaintiff:
Jessie D. McDonald
Defendant:
Marilyn Taylor, Two Unidentified Inspectors and Employess of the Metropolitan Development and Housing Agency, Metropolitan Development and Housing Development Agency and others
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Riptide, Inc. et al
as 5:2014cv00112
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Riptide, Inc. and Jason B. Seay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruth English et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as CAC/2:14-cv-01892
Plaintiff:
Ruth English , Pearl Brantley , Nataja Chardas and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and John Does
Federal Trade Commission v. IAB Marketing Associates, LP
as 3:2014cv00458
Defendant:
Gary D Wood, Health Service Providers Inc, Michael J. Wood and others
Intervenor:
Bank of America NA
Receiver:
John Arrastia and Charlene C Koonce
Interested Party:
Christine Bates
Respondent:
Mae Seay and John Seay
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Not Classified By Court:
United States of America (IRS)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Seay v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as 3:2013cv01988
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seay
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seay v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
as FLM/8:13-cv-01791
Plaintiff:
Ryan Seay
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
