Cases 71 - 80 of 143
Seawater Seafoods Company et al v. Dulcich et al
as 6:2016cv01607
Defendant:
Frank Dulcich, Dulcich Realty Acquisition, LLC, Pacific Fishing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Front St. Marine LLC, Bret Hamrick and Seawater Seafoods Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Magical Moment Weddings et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv06062
Plaintiff:
Magical Moment Weddings and Terry Hooker
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Happy Hooker Charters et al v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05232
Plaintiff:
Happy Hooker Charters and Joshua Davis
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company and BP p.l.c.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 2701
Stearns v. Cralar et al
as 2:2016cv00398
Plaintiff:
Nick Stearns and Martha A. Stearns
Defendant:
Cralar, Sparkling Dry Cleaning, Grace Shin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
Hooker v. U.S. Bank Trust, N.A., as Trustee for LSF9 Master Participation Trust et al
as 3:2016cv00121
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Hooker
Defendant:
U.S. Bank Trust, N.A. and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Overland Jones v. Queen City Corporation, et al
as 16-30477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OVERLAND JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CSX CORPORATION, TIM DUKES, Supervisor, Queen City Corporation, LRENIOR M. OEATOR, President, Queen City Corporation and others
Jones v. Queen City Corp et al
as 2:2015cv06683
Plaintiff:
Overland Jones
Defendant:
Queen City Corp, CSX Corporation, Tim Dukes and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Hooker et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC
as ALN/5:15-cv-01953
Plaintiff:
Leslie N. Hooker and Derrick Hooker
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC
Hooker v. Portfolio Recovery
as 1:2015cv00572
Plaintiff:
Patricia Hooker
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
