Cases 71 - 80 of 174
Melvin Bell v. USMS, et al
as 20-8008
Respondent:
R. A. HEISNER and UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Petitioner:
MELVIN T. BELL
Louis Holger Eklund, et al v. Timothy Burgess, et al
as 20-35112
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, RICH CURTNER, MARLIN L. RITZMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS HOLGER EKLUND
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTHONY OGLE
Phillip Camillo-Amisano v. BOP, et al
as 20-55038
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVE LANGFORD, Warden, FCC Lompoc, ALVAREZ, Lieutenant, individual, WILLIAM WATSON, M.D., individual and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP CAMILLO-AMISANO
Banks v. United States of America
as 19-3633
Respondent / Appellee:
Central Intelligence Agency, Warden, United States Environmental Protection Agency and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Frederick Banks
MONIER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2019cv01413
Plaintiff:
GLORIA MONIER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE(S)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346
Robert Hedrick v. United States Marshal's
as 19-7598
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT L. HEDRICK
Frederick Banks v. Asia Young, et al
as 19-3206
Defendant / Appellee:
ASIA YOUNG, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JIM BUCKLEY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
David Meyers v. Roanoke U.S. Attorney
as 19-7363
Respondent / Appellee:
ROANOKE UNITED STATES MARSHALL SERVICE, THOMAS T. CULLEN, U.S. Attorney, FBI, Richmond & Roanoke Field Office and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Holz v. United States Marshal Service
as 19-6136
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Frederick Banks v. Clerk US District Court, et al
as 19-3006
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES MARSHALS SERVICE, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF UNITED STATES COURTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
