Cases 81 - 90 of 17,457
Sakhi et al v. Blinken et al
as 1:2024cv01376
Plaintiff:
SARAH OBIDULAH SAKHI and HAMED AREFI
Defendant:
DEPUTY CHIEF Andrew Schofer, SECRETARY ANTONY J BLINKEN, ASST. SECRETARY RENA BITTER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act - Right of Review
Phillips v. Zakrajsek et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Defendant:
John Doe, Drew Zakrajsek, Ohio Lumex Co., Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pamela Phillips
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777 Civil Shell Case Opening
Muzumala v. Unknown Federal Agents
as 24-1267
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
UNKNOWN FEDERAL AGENTS, JOHN DOE, 1, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Hernandez v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3007
Defendant:
J. STEENBERGEN, Medical Personnel at USP Victorville, individual, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL MANK, Former Doctor at USP Victorville and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERTO HERNANDEZ
Raiser v. St. James Healthcare et al
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Frank Raiser
Defendant:
St. James Healthcare and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Davis v. Wright et al
as 1:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Tyreek Davis
Defendant:
A.J. Wright, E. Brandolino, Filoni and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Baldeo v. Airbnb, Inc.
as 24-1238
Plaintiff:
Dr. PHILIP BALDEO and 156 W. 15TH STREET CHELSEA LLC
Defendant:
AIRBNB, INC., JOHN DOES, 1-10 and JANE DOES, 1-10
Turner III v. John Doe
as 24-1242
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. TURNER, III
Defendant:
EDWARD RAPP and JOHN DOE
MAKTTOOF v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01344
Plaintiff:
VIAN ABDULKAREEM MAKTTOOF
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, SCOTT M. OUDKIRK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
JARJAWI v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
RAMA KHALIL OMAR JARJAWI
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ROHIT NEPAL and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
