Cases 81 - 90 of 151
USA v. Christopher Johnson
as 16-50018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
The Chiropractic Neurology Center of Tupelo et al v. Johnson et al
as 1:2015cv00219
Plaintiff:
The Chiropractic Neurology Center of Tupelo , Chiropractic Neurology Consultant PC , William Barlow and others
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, Apple Medical Clinics, SC, John Does Entities 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
USA v. Bryan Johnson
as 15-15223
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
BRYAN MICHAEL JOHNSON
IN RE: U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 1:2015mc01394
Defendant:
PERATON RISK DECISION INC, UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, DONNA SEYMOUR and others
In Re:
IN RE: U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, ROBERT CRAWFORD, ADAM DALE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Johnson v. On-Site Manager, Inc.
as 5:2015cv04409
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
On-Site Manager, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Johnson v. Credit Protection Association, L.P.
as 6:2015cv01087
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Credit Protection Association, L.P.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. CBD Energy Limited et al
as 4:2015cv01668
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson and Mahmmoud Sakhi
Defendant:
CBD Energy Limited, National Securities Corporation , Northland Securities, Inc. and others
Movant:
Shan Zhengjian and Charles McKissick
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
