Cases 81 - 90 of 144
Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. OptumRX, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
Muscogee (Creek) Nation
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc., Optum, Inc., OptumRX Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1621 Indian Health Care Improvement Fund
Cherokee Nation, The v. OptumRX, Inc. et al
as 6:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation, The
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc., Optum, Inc., OptumRX Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1621 Indian Health Care Improvement Fund
City of Cleveland, Ohio v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2023cv01417
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Eli Lilly & Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Cleveland, Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv03916
Plaintiff:
CITY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY and COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC., SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lake County, Illinois v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 1:2023cv02402
Plaintiff:
Lake County, Illinois
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv21048
Plaintiff:
Palm Beach County, FL., Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sandoz, Inc., West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 9:2023cv80431
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Indivior Inc., Asserto Therapeutics and others
Plaintiff:
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, Alachua County, FL, Levy County, FL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
In Re: Valsartan Losartan and Irbesartan Products
as 23-8006
Petitioner:
CVS PHARMACY INC, RITE AID CORP, WALGREEN CO and others
Respondent:
CONSUMER ECONOMIC LOSS PLAINTIFFS, THIRD-PARTY PAYOR PLAINTIFFS and MEDICAL MONITORING PLAINTIFFS
Not Yet Classified:
PRODUCT LIABILITY ADVISORY COUNCIL INC
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Health Net Life Insurance Company et al
as 8:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Satya Health of California, Inc., Adeona Healthcare, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Health Net Life Insurance Company and Optum Services, Inc.
Claimant:
Florentine Holding Company V, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc. et al v. Health Net Life Insurance Company et al
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Dual Diagnosis Treatment Center, Inc., Satya Health of California, Inc., Adeona Healthcare, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Health Net Life Insurance Company and Optum Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
