Cases 1 - 10 of 3,138
Koklich, et al. v. Borders, et al.
as 24-3505
Plaintiff:
BRUCE KOKLICH, individually and as Class Representatives, HAROLD W. TAYLOR, DAVID M. ZIEMKE and others
Defendant:
DEAN BORDERS, Warden and Senior Administrative and Policy making Officer, individual and official capacity and CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, a California Public Entity
Davis v. First National Bank of Pennsylvania
as 1:2024cv01575
Plaintiff:
Harold G Davis
Defendant:
First National Bank of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Republic of Nicaragua v. The Lopez-Goyne Family et al
as 3:2024cv03104
Petitioner:
THE REPUBLIC OF NICARAGUA
Respondent:
THE LOPEZ-GOYNE FAMILY TRUST, THE GOYNE FAMILY TRUST, THE BOCHNOWSKI FAMILY TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185 Enforcement of Arbitration Award
Pressly v. US
as 24-1823
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. PRESSLY, 8599 CAR LOT, LLC, DIANE M. AKERS and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES
Jean-Baptiste v. United States Department of Justice
as 24-1299
Plaintiff:
HAROLD JEAN-BAPTISTE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Shnaider et al v. American Muslims for Palestine et al
as 8:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Ethan Kessler Halley, Harvey Solomon Lipnick, Aileen Greenberg and others
Defendant:
American Muslims for Palestine, Americans for Justice in Palestine Educational Foundation, United States Palestinian Community Network and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies - International Terrorism
United States v. Dwayne Smith
as 24-1899
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Dwayne Harold Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
