Cases 1 - 10 of 1,158
Taylor et al v. Synchrony Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
Sean Taylor and Rachel Hawkins
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank and Synchrony Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
M.W. Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Free and Accepted Masons of Louisiana, Inc. v. Conference of Grand Masters Prince Hall Masons, Inc, et al
as 2:2024mc01364
Not Yet Classified:
F&A Masons M.W. Prince Hall Grand Lodge, Eugene Anderson, Jr., Jeffery Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Khatibi, et al. v. Hawkins, et al.
as 24-3108
Plaintiff:
AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual, MARILYN SINGLETON, M.D., an individual and DO NO HARM, a Virginia nonprofit corporation
Defendant:
RANDY HAWKINS, in his official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Khazin v. City of New York
as 24-1236
Plaintiff:
Sergeant VALENTIN KHAZIN and LAWRENCE HAWKINS
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, SYLVESTER GE, JOHN SANFORD and others
Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2213
Plaintiff:
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL, MARY H. MURGUIA, CHIEF CIRCUIT JUDGE and others
Targgart v. Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01927
Plaintiff:
Todd Targgart
Defendant:
Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc., Ken Rice, George Palikaras and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Felecia Hawkins v. CMG Media Corporation
as 24-10814
Plaintiff:
FELECIA HAWKINS
Defendant:
CMG MEDIA CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
