Cases 1 - 10 of 3,381
Ware v. Brann
as 24-2747
Defendant:
MARGARET EGAN, Board of Correction Executive Director, PATSY YANG, Vice President Corrections Health + Hospital and CYNTHIA BRANN, N.Y.C. DOC Commissioner
Plaintiff:
WALTER WARE
Quintana v. Lermond Psy, D, et al.
as 24-6335
Defendant:
CYNTHIA E. LERMOND PSY, D, individual capacity, official capacity, RAE M. HUEBNER, PSY, D., individual capacity, official capacity, JOHNNY JELHAOULI, LCSW, individual capacity, official capacity and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL NAVARRETE QUINTANA
Hayden, et al. v. County of Alameda, et al.
as 24-6296
Defendant:
DONALD HEARD, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, SHIRLEY WEBER and others
Plaintiff:
HUNTER COBB, JOHN LEON GUERRERO, MARK ZULIM and others
Bello v. Garland
as 24-6234
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA DAI-NIZ BELLO
Moore, et al. v. Mars Petcare US, Inc., et al.
as 24-6221
Respondent:
ROYAL CANIN USA, INC., MARS PETCARE US, INC. and HILL'S PET NUTRITION, INC.
Petitioner:
TAMARA MOORE, CYNTHIA WELTON, RENEE EDGREN and others
Johnson v. Crowdvest LLC
as 2:2024cv01293
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Johnson
Defendant:
Crowdvest LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Sessoms v. USHealth Advisors, LLC
as 5:2024cv00580
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Michelle Sessoms
Defendant:
USHealth Advisors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Weigel et al v. Turnquist et al
as 4:2024cv04188
Defendant:
Zach Weber, Tim Austin, Cohl Turnquist and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia F. Gibson and Jeffrey C. Weigel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PRICE v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv01603
Petitioner:
CYNTHIA PRICE
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Braccica v. Northwell Health Systems
as 24-2665
Plaintiff:
IRINA ABRAMOV, VERONICA NEWTON, JENNIFER BROWNE and others
Defendant:
NORTHWELL HEALTH SYSTEMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.