Cases 1 - 10 of 4,312
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC. et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01335
Plaintiff:
NELSON'S CABINETRY, INC., CARLOS EDUARDO PIMENTEL, KAREN GASPARETTO PIMENTEL and others
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MERRICK GARLAND and JACQUELINE WARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Lawson v. University of Hawaii, et al.
as 24-2862
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAWSON
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII, DAVID LASSNER, in his official and individual capacities, MICHAEL BRUNO, in his official and individual capacities and others
Estrada v. Alpha Lab Services, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03531
Plaintiff:
Nelson Estrada
Defendant:
Alpha Lab Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc. v. W. Kenneth Paxton et al
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc.
Defendant:
W. Kenneth Paxton and Jane Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRUCE v. T-MOBILE USA INC.
as 2:2024cv05721
Petitioner:
NELSON L. BRUCE
Respondent:
T-MOBILE USA INC.
Interested Party:
REV FEDERAL CREDIT UNION and TRANS UNION, LLC.
Jayaton-Kerry v. Cooper, et al.
as 24-2582
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JAYATON-KERRY, Third Party Intervenor/Injured party re Mary Alice Nelson-Rogers Trust
Defendant:
JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, KANDICE LEON, Deputy Superior Court Clerk, LEE SEALE, Superior Court Clerk and others
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
Pop-Ba, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2475
Petitioner:
CONSUELO POP-BA and NELSON GABRIEL CAB-POP
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
NELSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2024vv00586
Petitioner:
HOLLY C. NELSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
US v. Darryl Nelson, II
as 24-4203
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARRYL KENNETH DWAYNE NELSON, II
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
