Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Duffey
as 22-10265
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Corey Deyon Duffey, also known as Keyno, also known as Calvin Brown
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 4:2020cv02918
Plaintiff:
Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell, Michelle Knight and others
Defendant:
Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services, State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hotze, et al v. Abbott, et al
as 1:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Phil Wilson, Texas Department of State Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Hotze, Lynette Lucas, Debbie Smith Hartwell and others
Petitioner:
Alice Aten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Kelvin Townsend
as 19-10250
Defendant / Appellant:
KELVIN TOWNSEND, a.k.a. Kilven Townsend a.k.a Timmy Brown a.k.a. Mike Young a.k.a. Calvin Townsend a.k.a. JImmy Brown, a.k.a. Calvin Brown
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
US v. John Brown, III
as 15-7338
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN BROWN, III
USA v. Corey Duffey
as 12-11163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COREY DEYON DUFFEY, also known as Keyno, also known as Calvin Brown
US v. John Brown, III
as 10-4291
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN BROWN, III
USA v. Corey Duffey, et al
as 10-10103
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
COREY DEYON DUFFEY, also known as Keyno, also known as Calvin Brown, ANTONYO REECE, also known as Seven and JARVIS DUPREE ROSS, also known as Dookie, also known as Dapree Dollars, also known as Fifty
Comcast of Massachusetts III, Inc v. Brown
as 4:2007cv40140
Plaintiff:
Comcast of Massachusetts III, Inc
Defendant:
Calvin Brown
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Cable Communications Policy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
