Cases 1 - 10 of 650
US v. Sequan Fowler
as 24-4269
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SEQUAN ANTHONY FOWLER, a/k/a Smoke
Fowler and Sons, INC v. James A Fowler, III et al
as 1:2024cv11265
Plaintiff:
Fowler and Sons, INC; and The Fowler & Sons, INC. 401 (K)
Defendant:
James A Fowler, III, Charles W Fowler, Michael H Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
United States v. Fowler
as 24-6087
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ZACHARY CHARLES FOWLER
Reed v. Bean, et al.
as 24-2705
Plaintiff:
DAVID L REED
Defendant:
BEAN, Associate Warden, Lt GLENN FOWLER, JAMES DZURENDA, Director and others
USA v. Oscar Fowler, III
as 24-11065
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
OSCAR FREEMOND FOWLER, III
Fowler et al v. ASR Group International, Inc., et al
as NYS/1:24-CV-01972
Plaintiff:
Fowler, Linda Fowler and Isabella Benmeleh
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc, ASR Group International, Inc.,, American Sugar Refining, Inc. and others
Fowler et al v. ASR Group International, Inc., et al
as 1:2024cv01972
Plaintiff:
Linda Fowler and Isabella Benmeleh
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc.,, American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
In re Granulated Sugar Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2024cv01941
Plaintiff:
KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., Redner's Market, Inc., Isabella Benmeleh and others
Defendant:
ASR Group International, Inc.,, American Sugar Refining, Inc., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff:
Alexander Tai
Defendant:
Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
FOWLER v. USA
as 1:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
ERIC ORLANDO FOWLER
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
