Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Mota-Lugo v. Garland
as 24-60207
Petitioner:
Rodman Emir Mota-Lugo
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Mota-Lugo v. Garland
as 23-3526
Petitioner:
RODMAN EMIR MOTA-LUGO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rodman v. Snowberger
as 1:2022cv00118
Plaintiff:
Eugene Rodman
Defendant:
Michele Snowberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: TEC Equipment, Inc. v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70174
Not Classified By Court:
In re: TEC EQUIPMENT, INC., WAYNE A. WILLIAMS, NICOLE WILLIAMS, a minor and others
Petitioner:
TEC EQUIPMENT, INC.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Brocklesby et al v. Muzi Motors, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10384
Plaintiff:
Scott Brocklesby, Justin Maharath, James Jubb and others
Defendant:
Muzi Motors, Inc., Neal Cammarano, Glen Cammarano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Feds for Medical Freedom et al v. Biden, Jr. et al
as 3:2021cv00356
Plaintiff:
Feds for Medical Freedom, Local 918, American Federation of Government Employees, Highland Engineering, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., The United States of America, Pete Buttigieg and others
Counter Claimant:
Marcus William Thornton
Claimant:
Joseph Charles Ainsworth
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Quinn v. Crosby Capital USA LLC et al
as 21-1937
Plaintiff:
Teignmouth Hall LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Quinn
Defendant / Appellee:
Crosby Capital USA LLC, Yonel Devico, Joseph DeRuscio and others
Defendant:
ABL1 LLC
Tricia Rodman, et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 21-35533
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RODMAN and TRICIA RODMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC.
Ina Rodman v. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical
as 20-16646
Defendant / Appellee:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
INA ANN RODMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
