Cases 1 - 10 of 322
Pullay Villalobos v. Garland
as 24-925
Petitioner:
JUANA DOLORES PULLAY VILLALOBOS, JEREMY JAIR TELENCHANO PULLAY and ARLEY SARAHI TELENCHANO PULLAY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Villalobos et al v. D2C, LLC
as 5:2024cv01517
Plaintiff:
Dinorath Villalobos and Ezequiel Palomino
Defendant:
D2C, LLC doing business as Univision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jessica Villalobos v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3197
Petitioner:
JESSICA YAMILETH VILLALOBOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Aguilar-Villalobos v. Garland
as 24-616
Petitioner:
WARDIS OMAR AGUILAR-VILLALOBOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00550
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Villalobos-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 23-8051
Petitioner:
EDWIN JOSUE VILLALOBOS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Villalobos
as 23-50863
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rodolfo Villalobos, also known as Fluffy, also known as Chubs, also known as Oro
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Villalobos et al
as 1:2023cv03070
Plaintiff:
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant:
Pavel Garcia Villalobos, PPI Tavern, Inc. t/a PPI Bar t/a Luxury 360 Bar & Lounge t/a Luxury 360 Bar-Lounge t/a Luxury 360 Bar, Juana Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
Branch v. American First Finance, LLC
as 3:2023cv04311
Petitioner:
Maengra Branch, MARTHA ALCALA, JOSE ARELLANO and others
Respondent:
American First Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Aguilar-Villalobos v. Garland
as 23-6899
Petitioner:
WARDIS OMAR AGUILAR-VILLALOBOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
