Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MSP Recovery Claims, Series L, et al v. ALR, et al
as 19-11059
Defendant / Appellant:
ALERE INC., ALERE SAN DIEGO, INC. and ALERE HOME MONITORING, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SERIES PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO Recovery II, LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, a Florida limited liability and MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series, LLC
MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series LLC et al v. Alere Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv24703
Plaintiff:
Series PMPI, a designated series of MAO-MSO RECOVERY II, LLC, MSPA CLAIMS 1, LLC, a Florida limited liability and MSP RECOVERY CLAIMS, SERIES LLC, a Delaware series LLC
Defendant:
Alere Home Monitoring, Inc., Alere Inc. and Alere San Diego, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2345
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC v. Alere Home Monitoring, Inc.
as 3:2018cv04869
Plaintiff:
Sandusky Wellness Center, LLC
Defendant:
Alere Home Monitoring, Inc., Abbott Laboratories and Alere, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Corbo v. Alere Home Monitoring, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00742
Defendant:
Alere Home Monitoring, Inc., Alere, Inc. and Alert San Diego, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Corbo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type:
Other Statutes
ARcare Inc v. Alere Inc et al
as 4:2017cv00147
Plaintiff:
ARcare Inc
Defendant:
Alere Inc and Alere Home Monitoring Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ARcare, Inc. v. Alere, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv12093
Plaintiff:
ARcare, Inc.
Defendant:
Alere, Inc. and Alere Home Monitoring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
E. et al v. Alere, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11515
Plaintiff:
J. E. and J. D.
Defendant:
Alere, Inc., Alere San Diego, Inc. and Alere Home Monitoring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Falkenberg et al v. Alere Home Monitoring, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00341
Plaintiff:
John Falkenberg and Steven Ingargiola
Defendant:
Alere Home Monitoring, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
