Cases 1 - 10 of 207
Women of Color for Equal Justice v. The City of New York
as 24-3252
Plaintiff:
GEORGIANN GRATSLEY, MONIQUE MORENE, AYSE USTARES and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, ASHWIN VASAN, Commissioner of the Department of Health and Mental and others
Hacker v. Little et al
as 3:2024cv08191
Defendant:
Boyce J Little and Bradley W Carlyon
Petitioner:
Paulette Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kitler et al v. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints et al
as 1:2024cv01071
Defendant:
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, Robert Rubilar, Eric Selin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Kitler, Kresten Ballantyne and Alan Kitler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Thompson v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al.
as 24-4777
Defendant:
SUSAN B. SWIMLEY, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, BENJAMIN J. MANN and others
Plaintiff:
PETER THOMPSON
BOYCE v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as PAE/2:24-cv-03390
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JOHN BOYCE
Boyce v. St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) et al
as 3:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Sonja Marie Boyce
Defendant:
St. Vincent DePaul (Lane Co) and GBM Gardner Beckley Meadows
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC v. Dondero et al
as 3:2024cv00498
Plaintiff:
Highland Employee Retention Assets LLC
Defendant:
James Dondero, Mark Okada, Mark Katz and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Boyce v. Spruce Power Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08591
Plaintiff:
Toby Boyce
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Ledecky, Brian Piern, Thomas J. Hynes III and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spruce Power Holding Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
