Cases 1 - 10 of 1,312
Morales v. Gazzini, et al.
as 24-7007
Defendant:
B. ROBINSON, WOLFF, spelling updated, see #8 Order, MICHAEL MINEV and others
Plaintiff:
YOANDY FERNANDEZ MORALES
Dawson et al v. Porch.com Inc et al
as 3:2024cv07974
Plaintiff:
Mark Anderson, Leo Anderson, Robert Allen and others
Defendant:
Porch.com Inc., GoSmith Inc. and Matthew Ehrlichman
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Johnson v. Clerk Bob
as 24-2991
Petitioner:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Respondent:
Supervisor Clerk BOB, of City of Syracuse: City Court
Pierce v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00385
Defendant:
Bob Ferguson, State of Washington and Jay Inslee
Plaintiff:
Chad Alan Pierce
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 925 (c) Restoration of ability to possess firearms/ammo
White v. Hager, et al.
as 24-6836
Defendant:
LARRY HALL, CHARLES DANIELS, ERIC LOPEZ and others
Plaintiff:
TONEY A. WHITE
Joseph Rowe v. Perkins, et al.
as 24-6449
Respondent:
JEFFEREY PERKINS, Superintendent, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center, MELISSA ANDREWJESKI, SUPERINTENDENT, Coyote Ridge Corrections Center and BOB FERGUSON, Attorney General, State of Washington
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY PETER JOSEPH ROWE
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. BOBSK, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv04047
Defendant:
Bob Lopes, Agostinho Bob Lopes, BOBSK, LLC doing business as Bob's Lounge & Grill and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05828
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05829
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporting
Manizak v. Simpson et al
as 2:2024cv12517
Defendant:
Dinnes McGill, Todd Lince, Bob Rice and others
Plaintiff:
Paul R Manizak
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
