Cases 1 - 10 of 23
United States v. J. C. Watson
as 24-1500
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
J. C. Watson
Howell-Fedorov et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 9:2023cv80095
Plaintiff:
Alexander Howell-Fedorov and Damon Fedorov-Howell-Karriem
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Law Office of Marshall C. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Young v. US
as 21-1192
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANLEY C. WATSON, et al., BELLA LIANG, BONNIE ROSE SINGH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Mario Reyes v. Sergeant Volk, et al
as 20-2813
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MANTON, OFFICER DURAL, OFFICER WESSEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO REYES
White v. Barnhardt, et al
as 20-1306
Defendant / Appellee:
STRATON, J. BRINSON, L. AZZEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN WHITE
Darren Henderson v. J. Lewis, et al
as 19-16958
Defendant:
KIM KUMAR, B. MARSHALL and W. L. MUNIZ
Defendant / Appellee:
J. RODRIGUEZ, LVN, L. GAMBOA, M.D., J. LEWIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN HENDERSON
William C. Watson et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 5:2018cv00273
Defendant:
Does, Mastr Asset Backed Securities Trust 2004-FRE1, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon E. Watson and William C. Watson
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. WATSON
as 1:2015cv13868
Plaintiff:
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
STEVEN C WATSON
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. FBOP Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv04307
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
PMT Credit Opportunities Fund Ltc., Gordon C. Watson, Canyon Balanced Master Fund, Ltd. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
Intervenor Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
