Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
In Re: Talasazan
as 23-1780
Petitioner:
HAREL TALASAZAN
Respondent:
ROBERT M. FARRELL, MARIA RAIA HAMILTON, MA BOARD OF BAR OVERSEERS and others
US v. Alfonso Brito
as 23-4511
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALFONSO ROMAN BRITO, a/k/a Casper
Smith v. Judge Denise Casper et al
as 1:2023cv11655
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
Judge Denise Casper and U.S. Marshals Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-15333
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company LLC, et al v. EPA
as 22-1183
Petitioner:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company LLC and Sinclair Casper Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Lu v. Saylor et al
as 1:2022cv11106
Plaintiff:
Friedrich Lu
Defendant:
F. Dennis Saylor, Jon David Levin, Patti B. Saris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States v. John Fortenberry
as 22-1972
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Richard Fortenberry, also known as JR Fortenberry, also known as Richard Faulkenberry, also known as JJ Casper Knight, also known as JJ Casperberry
United States v. John Fortenberry
as 22-1966
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
John Richard Fortenberry, also known as JR Fortenberry, also known as Richard Faulkenberry, also known as JJ Casper Knight, also known as JJ Casperberry
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company LLC, et al v. EPA
as 22-1073
Petitioner:
Sinclair Wyoming Refining Company LLC and Sinclair Casper Refining Company LLC
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
