Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Courtney Smith v. Ron Neal, et al
as 19-2363
Defendant / Appellee:
RON NEAL and WEXFORD MEDICAL SERVICES
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COURTNEY SMITH
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC v. The International Longshore and Warehouse Union et al
as 3:2018cv02177
Defendant:
James Holland, John Peak, Lawrence Thibedeau and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Export Terminal, LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Anderson et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11509
Plaintiff:
Norman Del Toro, James Baumert, James Meskill and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
SMITH v. FBCS, INC.
as 2:2017cv04913
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY SMITH
Defendant:
FBCS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitney Broach v. David Peake
as 17-20229
Appellant:
WHITNEY N. BROACH, also known as Courtney Smith, also known as Cherie Werling, doing business as Laser Tattoo Removal, Incorporated, also known as Cherie Broach, doing business as Aesthetic Permanent Cosmetics, Incorporated
Appellee:
DAVID G. PEAKE, Chapter 13 Trustee
United States of America v. Hernandez (Osborne)
as 17-171
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Derick Hernandez, AKA D-Nice, Merlyn Bernitez, AKA Frankie C, Daquanne Nunn, AKA Trap and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Raphael Osborne, AKA Gusto
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States v. Courtney Smith
as 08-3383
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Courtney Smith
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
