Cases 1 - 10 of 11
D D M Logistics Inc. v. CJ Logistics Freight America, LLC
as 1:2024cv02937
Plaintiff:
D D M Logistics Inc.
Defendant:
CJ Logistics Freight America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
S. J. M.-D. C. v. Garland
as 21-821
Petitioner:
S. J. M.-D. C., A. J. C.-M. and P. D. C.-M.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Ramirez v. Garland
as 22-1162
Petitioner:
LESLIE DAYANA HERNANDEZ-RAMIREZ and D. A. M.-H.
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
In re: Metcalf
as 22-1506
Petitioner / Appellant:
RON DAVID METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M. and CLAUDIA METCALF, Parent/advocate, legal guardian as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child D. J. M
Not Yet Classified:
D.J.M.
D. M. v. Attorney General United States
as 20-2503
Petitioner:
D. G. M.
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06010
Plaintiff:
Amato's Auto Body, Inc., Campbell's Auto Body, Inc., Pacific Coast Auto Body, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mercury Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company, Wawanesa General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Gail Smith v. Durham D and M LLC
as 19-6259
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL DENISE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DURHAM D AND M LLC
Abacuc Heras v. D and M LLC et al
as 2:2017cv06590
Defendant:
D and M and Does
Plaintiff:
Abacuc Heras
D Ann M. Patterson v. The Capital Group Companies, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04399
Defendant:
Capital Guardian Trust Company, Capital International, Inc., Capital Research and Management Company and others
Plaintiff:
D Ann M. Patterson
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. De Jesus et al
as 2:2015cv00676
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Maria De Jesus and M D V M LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
