Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bollat Vasquez, et al v. Wolf, et al
as 20-1554
Plaintiff / Appellee:
J.C., LUISA M. VASQUEZ PEREZ DE BOLLAT, ANDRES OSWALDO BOLLAT VASQUEZ, individually and as next friend to Luisa Marisol Vasquez Perez de Bollat, and as father and next friend to A.B. and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, CHAD F. WOLF, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP and others
Amicus Curiae:
DAVID ROBINSON, JUSTICE CENTER OF SOUTHEAST MASSACHUSETTS, KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE and others
Dana Smith, et al v. Kevin SingerIn re: Dana Smith, et al v. Kevin Singer
as 19-55622
Appellant:
DANA A. SMITH
Appellee:
KEVIN SINGER
Debtor:
In the Matter of: DANA A. SMITH
United States v. Smith
as 19-4056
Defendant / Appellant:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Davidson v. Desai
as 19-280
Defendant:
Robert Guzman, Anne Rabideau, R.N., Deborah Bartlett-Bigg, R.N. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Dana M. Smith, Heman K. Fowler, N.P., Cheng Yin, M.D. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Davidson
In Re: Dana A. Smith
as 2:2018cv02975
In Re Debtor:
Dana A. Smith
Appellant:
Dana A. Smith
Appellee:
U.S. Trustee
Dana Smith v. USDC-IDB
as 14-71985
:
In re: DANA LYDELL SMITH
Petitioner:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, MINIDOKA COUNTY SHERIFF and others
Mack v. Barrett
as 10-4212
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sergio Ponder
Petitioner:
Anthony Mack
Respondent:
David Barrett, Industry Superintendent at Elmira Correctional & Reception Center, Larry Pocobello, Industry Training Assistant Superintendent at Elmira, Jack Rathburn, Industrial Foreman at Elmira and others
Dana Smith v. United States District Court
as 10-71912
:
In re: DANA LYDELL SMITH
Petitioner:
DANA LYDELL SMITH
Respondent:
USDC, BOISE
Real Party In Interest:
NICOLE CANNON, STATE OF IDAHO, BARRY WOOD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
