Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07152
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Calderon Lopez v. Kausner
as 24-2011
Defendant:
TRIZECHAHN INC., TRIZEC PROPERTIES INC., AIMCO CORP., dba Broadcast Center and others
Plaintiff:
RICARDO J. CALDERON LOPEZ
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 24-1150
Plaintiff:
JODI BOURGEOIS
Defendant:
GAP, INC., OLD NAVY INC., BANANA REPUBLIC and others
Bourgeois v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jodi Bourgeois
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Old Navy, LLC, Banana Republic, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Design Gaps, Inc. v. Shelter, LLC
as 23-1729
Petitioner / Appellant:
DESIGN GAPS, INC., DAVID GLOVER and EVA GLOVER
Respondent / Appellee:
SHELTER, LLC, JASON HIGHSMITH and KACIE M. HIGHSMITH
Design Gaps, Inc. et al v. Shelter, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv04698
Petitioner:
Design Gaps, Inc., David Glover and Eva Glover
Respondent:
Shelter, LLC, Dr. Jason Highsmith and Kacie M. Highsmith
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Diaz v. The Gap, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv07371
Plaintiff:
Joshua Diaz
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc., Sonia Syngal and Katrina OConnell
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-55957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones et al v. The Raymond Corporation
as 3:2022mc80074
Plaintiff:
Rodney Jones and Deangela Battle
Intervenor:
New Hampshire Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Raymond Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
The Gap, Inc.
Christine Alire, et al v. The Gap, Inc., et al
as 21-55752
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHRISTINE ALIRE
Plaintiff:
SHADI HAYDEN, JERRY HO, WILLIAM HANNUM and others
Defendant / Appellant:
THE GAP, INC.
Defendant:
THE RETAIL EQUATION, INC., SEPHORA USA, INC., ADVANCE AUTO PARTS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
