Cases 1 - 10 of 69
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer v. The Boeing Company et al
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
State of Rhode Island Office of The General Treasurer, on Behalf of The Employees' Retirement System of The State of Rhode Island and State of Rhode Island Office of the General Treasurer
Defendant:
The Boeing Company, David L. Calhoun, Dennis A. Muilenburg and others
Smith v. McDonough
as 22-2213
Claimant:
GREGORY DOUGLAS SMITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Smith v. The State of Missouri Consumer Protection Division
as 4:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
The State of Missouri Consumer Protection Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320 Disclosure of Health Information - HIPAA
Smith v. The State of Missouri
as 4:2021cv00714
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
The State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1320
USA v. Smith
as 21-30252
Defendant / Appellant:
Gregory Alan Smith
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Stein v. Intel Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv03662
Defendant:
Patrick P. Gelsinger, Robert H. Swan, Alyssa Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Clancy v. Swan, et al.
as 1:2020cv01662
Defendant:
Robert H. Swan, Venkata S.M. Renduchintala, Alyssa Henry and others
Nominal Defendant:
Intel Corporation
Plaintiff:
Eileen Clancy
Smith v. The U.S. Department of Justice
as 4:2020cv00592
Defendant:
The U.S. Department of Justice and DOJ
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Kenny K. Wang, et al v. John J. Tharp, Jr.
as 20-1402
Interested Party:
BRET E. TAGGART, ROBERT W. KEGLEY, SR., GREGORY D. SMITH and others
Petitioner:
KENNY W. WANG, KATHLEEN WANG and KENNY K. WANG
Respondent:
JOHN J. THARP, JR.
Smith v. The State of Missouri
as 4:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
Gregory Wayne Smith
Defendant:
The State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
