Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Barnes v. Dominic
as 24-521
Plaintiff:
JESSIE J. BARNES
Defendant:
Captain STACY DOMINIC, Upstate Correctional Facility, Lieutenant STEVEN SALLS, JR., Upstate Correctional Facility, Lieutenant JAMES H. ANCTIL, Upstate Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Atas v. The New York Times Company
as 24-58
Defendant / Appellee:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, DEAN BAQUET, ELLEN POLLOCK and others
Defendant / Appellant:
NADIRE ATAS
USA v. Damion Helmes
as 23-2968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMION HELMES
United States of America v. Helm
as 23-2845
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSHUA LEE HELM
C-Tech Rubber LLC v. Helms Jr. et al
as 2:2023cv04774
Plaintiff:
C-Tech Rubber LLC
Defendant:
Robert Fred Helms Jr. and Marketing Sales Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Helms v. Orlando & Northwestern Railway LLC
as 5:2023cv00577
Plaintiff:
SILVANA HELMS
Defendant:
ORLANDO & NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HELM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv01896
Petitioner:
JAMES M. HELM
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
In re: J. D., et al v. Juul Labs, Inc.
as 22-80063
Not Classified By Court:
In re: JUUL LABS, INC., MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Respondent:
J. D., through his parent and natural guardian Nicole Dramis, M. C., through his Parent and Natural Guardian Jeanine Manning, O. V., a minor, through her parent and natural guardian Tanya Viti and others
Defendant:
PAX LABS, INC., NU MARK LLC, JAMES MONSEES and others
Petitioner:
JUUL LABS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
