Cases 1 - 10 of 4,977
Carroll Independent School District v. United States Department of Education et al
as 4:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Carroll Independent School District
Defendant:
United States Department of Education, Miguel Cardona, in his capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Education, Catherine E. Lhamon, in her official capacity as Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights at the United States Department of Education and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Council for Responsible Nutrition v. James
as 24-1343
Plaintiff:
COUNCIL FOR RESPONSIBLE NUTRITION
Defendant:
LETITIA JAMES, in her official capacity as New York Attorney General
Davidson v. Office of Court Administration
as 24-1331
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVIDSON
Defendant:
OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION, Hon. LAWRENCE MARKS, in his official capacity and personally, ALIA RAZZAQ, in her official capacity as Chief Clerk of the New York City Civil Court and others
Mi Familia Vota, et al. v. Petersen, et al.
as 24-3188
Plaintiff:
MI FAMILIA VOTA, VOTO LATINO, LIVING UNITED FOR CHANGE IN ARIZONA and others
Defendant:
ADRIAN FONTES, in his official capacity as Arizona Secretary of State, KRIS MAYES, ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL, in her official capacity as Arizona Attorney General, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Intervenor:
WARREN PETERSEN, President of the Arizona Senate, BEN TOMA, Speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Maryland Chapter of the Sierra Club v. Federal Highway Adminstration
as 24-1447
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND CHAPTER OF THE SIERRA CLUB, part of Sierra Club, Inc., NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES, NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INCORPORATED and others
Defendant:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINSTRATION, STEPHANIE POLLACK, in her capacity as Acting Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration, GREGORY MURRILL, in his official capacity as Maryland Division Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al
as 24-1480
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Defendant:
JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity, NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE and GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN, CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Massachusetts Lobsterman's Association, Inc. v. Conservation Law Foundation, et al
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
MASSACHUSETTS LOBSTERMAN'S ASSOCIATION, INC.
Appellant:
CONSERVATION LAW FOUNDATION, INC., DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE and WHALE AND DOLPHIN CONSERVATION SOCIETY
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary, in her official capacity and JANET COIT, Assistant Administrator, in her official capacity
Interested Party:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MASSACHUSETTS DIVISION OF MARINE FISHERIES and RICHARD MAXIMUS STRAHAN
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 24-1309
Petitioner:
TOWAKI KOMATSU
Respondent:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, LISA FITZPATRICK, sued in their individual and official capacities, NIGEL MARKS, sued in their individual and official capacities and others
Odquina v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
as 24-3105
Plaintiff:
EDWARD ODQUINA
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Khatibi, et al. v. Hawkins, et al.
as 24-3108
Plaintiff:
AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual, MARILYN SINGLETON, M.D., an individual and DO NO HARM, a Virginia nonprofit corporation
Defendant:
RANDY HAWKINS, in his official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
