Cases 1 - 10 of 20
James Hall v. G.M.S. Management Co., Inc., et al
as 21-4210
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES WILLIAM HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
G.M.S. MANAGEMENT CO., INC., JAMES R. OGDEN, BARBERTON MUNICIPAL COURT, OH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01037
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
USA v. Timothy J. Carr
as 21-1668
Defendant / Appellant:
TIMOTHY J. CARR
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Carr, IV v. SRA International Inc, et al
as 20-2692
Defendant / Appellee:
CSRA INC and SRA INTERNATIONAL INC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN J. CARR, IV
Securities And Exchange Commission v. The Nutmeg Group, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv01775
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Defendant:
The Nutmeg Group, LLC, Randall Goulding, David Goulding, INC and others
Respondent:
Michael Alonso, Lawrence Altholtz, Altholtz Family Limited Partnership and others
Receiver:
Leslie Weiss
Petitioner:
Brandon Goulding, Ryan D Goulding and Alan D Lasko
Intervenor:
Alan D. Lasko and Lasko & Associates, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Swisher International, Inc. et al v. Rutherford Supply Co. et al
as 3:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Swisher International, Inc. , Swisher USA Operations, Inc. and ECOLAB, Inc.
Defendant:
Rutherford Supply Co. , John Lockwood , Patrick Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
United States of America v. Carr
as 1:2013mc00042
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Darryl J. Carr
Carr et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al
as NYW/1:13-cv-00631
Plaintiff:
Herbert J. Carr and Marilyn Carr
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corp.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
