Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Mey v. Pintas et al
as 5:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Diana Mey
Defendant:
William Pintas, P&M Law Firm, LLC, P&M Law Firm (PR), LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Grant, et al v. Crow, et al
as 21-6139
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT, GILBERT RAY POSTELLE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE, CARLOS CUESTA-RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Grant, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6129
Plaintiff:
JOHN M. GRANT, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIUS D. JONES, DONALD ANTHONY GRANT and GILBERT RAY POSTELLE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, RANDY CHANDLER, BETTY GESELL and others
Defendant:
STEVE BURRAGE, EDWARD EVANS, Warden, KEVIN J. GROSS and others
Lay, et al v. El Habti, et al
as 21-6101
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WADE LAY
Not Yet Classified:
BRENDA E. ANDREW, JAMES A. CODDINGTON, BENJAMIN R. COLE and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ALEXANDER DAVIS, SHELTON D. JACKSON, JULIUS D. JONES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ABOUTANAA EL HABTI, Warden, Mabel Bassett Correctional Center, in her official capacity, SCOTT CROW, Director, ODOC, in his official capacity, RANDY CHANDLER and others
Defendant:
JOE M. ALLBAUGH, IV TEAM LEADER, IV TEAM MEMBERS#1-10 and others
Amicus Curiae:
ALL NON-PARTY PLAINTIFFS, EXCEPT WADE LAW
Abrahams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11519
Plaintiff:
Peter Cullen, Duwayne Tinsley, Joseph Cerrato and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Ramirez v. Amazing Home Contractors, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02413
Plaintiff:
David Vasquez Ramirez
Defendant:
Amazing Home Contractors, Inc. and James Ryder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv01307
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
