Cases 1 - 10 of 46
GIBSON et al v. STROUD et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LEON GIBSON and MICHELLE P. GIBSON
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunter Mountain Investment TrustIn re: Hunter Mountain Investment Trust
as 23-10376
Petitioner:
In re: Hunter Mountain Investment Trust
Respondent:
Highland Capital Management, L.P., Highland Capital Trust, James P. Seery, Jr. and others
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION v. STROUD et al.
as 1:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION and Black Feather and Coosa Nation, a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
John Gray v. Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution
as 21-7695
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN GRAY
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN OF JESSUP CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hollie Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 21-14305
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA and others
John Gray v. Warden of Jessup Correctional Institution
as 21-4279
Defendant / Appellee:
MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL and WARDEN OF JESSUP CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN GRAY
Randy Dingle v. Talmage Baggett
as 20-2041
Defendant / Appellee:
PATRICIA ELLEN WATSON DINGLE, Individual, JASON L. HARRELL, Aent - Sheriff, DAVID E. MOORE, JR. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDY DINGLE
Jeffrey Jessup v. Barnes Group, Inc.
as 20-1801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY A. JESSUP
Defendant / Appellee:
BARNES GROUP, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
