Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Reynolds v. R1 RCM Inc
as 2:2023cv00135
Plaintiff:
Raymond L Reynolds
Defendant:
R1 RCM Inc doing business as Medical Financial Solutions
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Perman et al v. Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust et al
as 1:2023cv10809
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Perman and Nessa Perman
Defendant:
Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, Kenneth R Leibler, Robert L. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Rider-El v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv13022
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Rider-El
Defendant:
United States of America, Wanda R. Cal, Karen L. Reynolds and others
Renee McCray v. Samuel White
as 20-1945
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III, SARA K. TURNER, SAMUEL I. WHITE, P.C. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENEE L. MCCRAY
Kier Gardner v. David Reynolds, et al
as 19-35722
Defendant / Appellee:
WHATCOM COUNTY COUNCIL, WHATCOM COUNTY CLERK'S OFFICE, KRISTIAN E. HEDINE, Judge, Walla Walla County District Court and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIER KEAND'E GARDNER
Renee McCray v. Samuel White, P.C.
as 19-1314
Defendant:
WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, d/b/a America's Servicing Company, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., JOHN DOES 1-20 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY LANE, JOHN E. DRISCOLL, III, JANA M. GANTT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENEE L. MCCRAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv03491
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1501
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-2458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
