Cases 1 - 10 of 130
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS NUMBER 23 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ADRIANA CECILIA BRANCAFORTE V. CHRISTIAN LEDESMA GARCA
as 2:2024cv00168
Petitioner:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Not Yet Classified:
IN RE: REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE NATIONAL COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE IN CIVIL MATTERS NUMBER 23 IN BUENOS AIRES, ARGENTINA IN ADRIANA CECILIA BRANCAFORTE V. CHRISTIAN LEDESMA GARCA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Letter rogatory - appointment
Toth et al v. Toth-Ledesma et al
as 3:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Alex Toth and Gladys Martinez-Toth
Defendant:
Alexandria Toth-Ledesma and Michael Ledesma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
USA v. Arturo Ledesma, Jr.
as 23-1173
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
ARTURO LEDESMA, JR.
USA v. Jamilie Ledesma
as 22-2111
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAMILIE LEDESMA
United States of America v. Ledesma et al
as 2:2022mc51646
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jamile Ledesma, Jason Ledesma, Uriel Galvan-Maciel and others
Interested Party:
Joshua Venable
USA v. Diodayan Ledesma-Cuesta
as 22-2278
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIODAYAN LEDESMA-CUESTA
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2022cv02066
Defendant:
Ledesma William Alvaro, Savage Hearted and Christopher Lamar Gaston
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
USA v. Diodayan Ledesma-Cuesta
as 22-1377
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DIODAYAN LEDESMA-CUESTA
Paul Johnson v. Ron Davis, et al
as 21-17050
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN, R. BROOMFIELD and others
USA v. Negrete-Ledesma
as 21-20652
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Froylan Negrete-Ledesma
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
